Sanjay Dutt is a tragedy for Sunil Dutt and his family. Neither his teens nor the fifty plus maturity made him a wise person. He is always surrounded by wrong peoples and that makes him suffer heavily. The protection of a influential father and later a sister has saved him so far from the worst. But time is never be same again. The company of Mulayam Singh and Amar Singh is bound to put him in another controversy. His sister has already disaprooved his marriage with Manyata and his decision to join Samajwadi Party.
Let's see what lies in future.
Showing posts with label Sanjay Dutt. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sanjay Dutt. Show all posts
Friday, January 16, 2009
Wednesday, August 22, 2007
Sanjay Dutt's sentencing and afterwards
Congress party openly coming in support of Mumbai Blast TADA court convict Sanjay Dutt is deplorable. One can agree to the plight of the sister Priya who is congress MP, but bringing in party machinery to get out a convict out of judicial process in certainly not understandable.
Convictions in TADA cases have disturbed many in state and at center so that they are making a issue to implement Shrikrishna commission, which is a step to please the minority. These people very well understand the distinction between these two crimes. Shrikrishna commission is set to enquire the post babari riots which were spontaneous as in the case of every other riot, wherein the TADA court convictions are for the planned crime against society.
But those who look at every decision from votes garnering point, are difficult to understand the implications in taking the things to turmoil.
Congress party openly coming in support of Mumbai Blast TADA court convict Sanjay Dutt is deplorable. One can agree to the plight of the sister Priya who is congress MP, but bringing in party machinery to get out a convict out of judicial process in certainly not understandable.
Convictions in TADA cases have disturbed many in state and at center so that they are making a issue to implement Shrikrishna commission, which is a step to please the minority. These people very well understand the distinction between these two crimes. Shrikrishna commission is set to enquire the post babari riots which were spontaneous as in the case of every other riot, wherein the TADA court convictions are for the planned crime against society.
But those who look at every decision from votes garnering point, are difficult to understand the implications in taking the things to turmoil.
Tuesday, November 28, 2006
Sanjay Dutt convicted
Sanjay Dutt convicted by TADA court under Arms act but not for the Mumbai Blasts case of 1993. He faces maximum five years in prison. Judge Kode said "During my reasoning, I have not found him (Sanjay) to be a terrorist". He then went to announce his judgement, that the court had found Sanjay Dutt guilty primarily on three accounts:
his own confession statement; the confession statement of his co-accused; and recovery of weapons from his
residence as evidence.
Sanjay, who spent about 16 months in prison after his arrest in April 1993, was found guilty under Sections 3 and 7 read with Section 25 of the Indian Arms Act. Under Section 3, he was found guilty of possessing a 9mm pistol and under Section 7 for possessing an AK-56 rifle, a prohibited weapon.
Under these charges, he faces a maximum of five years in prison. The court, on Sanjay's plea, extended his bail and asked him to surrender on December 19. The court also let off Sanjay's friends Yusuf Nallawalla and Kersi Adajenia for terrorism charges but found them guilty under the Arms Act and for destroying evidence.
Dutt received three AK-56 rifles, its ammunition, 9 mm pistol, its cartridges and hand grenades, which were part of the consignment smuggled by Tiger Memon to set off a series of blasts in Mumbai on March 12, 1993.
Sanjay Dutt convicted by TADA court under Arms act but not for the Mumbai Blasts case of 1993. He faces maximum five years in prison. Judge Kode said "During my reasoning, I have not found him (Sanjay) to be a terrorist". He then went to announce his judgement, that the court had found Sanjay Dutt guilty primarily on three accounts:
his own confession statement; the confession statement of his co-accused; and recovery of weapons from his
residence as evidence.
Sanjay, who spent about 16 months in prison after his arrest in April 1993, was found guilty under Sections 3 and 7 read with Section 25 of the Indian Arms Act. Under Section 3, he was found guilty of possessing a 9mm pistol and under Section 7 for possessing an AK-56 rifle, a prohibited weapon.
Under these charges, he faces a maximum of five years in prison. The court, on Sanjay's plea, extended his bail and asked him to surrender on December 19. The court also let off Sanjay's friends Yusuf Nallawalla and Kersi Adajenia for terrorism charges but found them guilty under the Arms Act and for destroying evidence.
Dutt received three AK-56 rifles, its ammunition, 9 mm pistol, its cartridges and hand grenades, which were part of the consignment smuggled by Tiger Memon to set off a series of blasts in Mumbai on March 12, 1993.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
